Mike (of Rational Reasons):
... Levant is a cowardly racist nit. You realize that he was all for censorship and quashing free speech back in 93 when a student newspaper at his University published and anti-Israel cartoon (not anti-Jewish, but anti-Israel - there is a difference)? Oops I guess free speech and free expression is only good when you agree with Ezra, right? Some principles you've got there....
My Response:
By my calculations, Ezra Levant was 19 years old in 1993. He is now 35. Even if what you are saying is true, are you prepared to call every single person who has changed their positions over the period of 15 years, especially since they'd been a teenager, a hypocrite?
Once again, as I've been writing, you guys just don't want to address the issue, you're hunting for ways to attack the messenger while doing it, in order to bolster your moral superiority.
...
From Wikpedia (referenced text)
As head of the U of A's speakers committee, Levant flew in controversial lawyer Doug Christie, best known for his advocacy in defence of Holocaust deniers and accused Nazi war criminals, for a debate.
In University, at the age of 20, Ezra Levant, a practicing Jew, actually DEFENDED the right of anti-semites and Nazi war criminals.
Kind of throws your hole "hypocrisy" evidence right out the door.
Looks like Ezra has a history of defending people who actually hate him. So where are you left wing idiots getting this evidence of Ezra's two-sidedness on the free speech issue? Blind assumption? Your anus?
So I've managed to dig up evidence that directly contradicts the apparent self-evident truth that Ezra is a lifelong habitual hypocrite. I'd like to see some hard evidence to counter this.
7 comments:
Mike, just stop bothering with all these morons... understand they will never see reason. They simply view you as an apologist for Ezra Levant and no amount of "rational" or logical argument is going to convince them otherwise.
Yes, when I mention an incident from 93, I'm bad for dredging up the past to support my position. But you can hold up an incident from '94, well you are ok for using that to support yours.
Yes, Interesting double standard there Mike.
"you guys just don't want to address the issue"
Well actually we have. You and I both agree that Ezra is right on free speech. I state quite clearly that I don't agree with hate speech laws HRC or investigations and that I support Ezra, even though I don't like him or his politics.
So, exactly, what "issue" are you referring to?
Are you upset that I dare question his motives in deftly manufacturing this little hearing? Are you upset that, despite my support for him, it is my pinion that Ezra is an anti-Muslim bigot.
I was not aware there were things I was not allowed to discus in relation to this, or that I must not only support Ezra, I must love him.
And for a later version of Ezra acting hypocritical, check the link to Terry Glavin from my latest reply to you. Does requesting the laying of a hate crimes charge even after the Mounties found no evidence enough? Given his own words in the video, that he can say and publish things even if he's being unreasonable, does that count as hypocritical?
I'm sure you'll find a reason to say its not...
Yes, Mike, I read it. And reading Ezra's article in that case, it would seem that you and Terry managed to gloss over the fact that Mr. Levant's problem with the people in question is that they were calling for the "killing of Jews".
I'm sorry, but that is a statement meant to compel people to action, to commit Murder. That doesn't make him a hypocrite.
You're really grasping at straws. You really need to give it up.
Well, the RCMP found no basis for a charge, despite the allegations, but Levant wanted him charged anyway. That isn't grasping at straws. The police found no evidence to lay a charge, but Ezra wanted one anyway, because he didn't like what that crazy Imam said (an neither do I - they guys is clearly a slack-jawed anti-semite). Don't get upset with me, figure out why the Mounties didn't lay a charge. You seem to be glossing over that fact.
But clearly I can never justify my opinion of Ezra to you and we are starting to repeat ourselves. If you wish to try again, feel free to drop by, other wise I'll see you at stageleft...
Your whole argument falls apart anyways when reading the article carefully, and I quote my comment from your blog:
-snip-snip-
The fourth sentence of his article in which your indict him with hypocrisy is this:
It cost millions of tax dollars, and more than that, was an energetic expression of the government's opposition to racial and religious discord. Libertarians were rightly upset that speech -- no matter how vile -- could be criminalized
So up front, Ezra Levant establishes he is against hate speech legislation.
But Mr. Levant asks the question:
Why was Keegstra's offensive but non-violent anti-Semitism taken to the Supreme Court, but Kathrada's is tolerated with impunity?
You know, this was not proof at all. I didn't have to minimize it. Ezra Levant is saying he disagrees with hate speech legislation at the beginning the article, he is merely criticizing courts for not applying the law that he disagrees with in the first place, in a balanced manner. In fact, the entire article plays into Ezra's point, that hate speech legislation is a bad idea, because it's ultimately applied in a political way.
You've proven nothing. You just dug yourself even deeper into a credibility hole. Did you even read the article in question? If so, did you read it carefully?
You are grasping at straws. You still have no evidence.
-snip-snip-
Basically close reading of the article shows he was not being a hypocrite at all. He criticizes both the hate speech legislation, and is making a point that he feels it isn't being applied evenly. This is not hypocrisy on the free speech issue, my friend.
Good try though. I'm waiting for the next one.
I don't know Ezra Levant's background, but I do know that if Muslims dominate the world the rest of us will have few to NO HUMAN RIGHTS at all.
See this site:
The Truth About Islam
The Ballad of Alberta Human Rights
So you’re looking around for what I have found,
A girl who is eager to fuck.
All I can say, she’s a fabulous lay
And especially you’ll love her to suck.
If you want to be sure of a really good whore
You must to go the Lady Shirlene.
She knows all the tricks for the sucking of dicks
And her fucking is fucking obscene.
She’s no inhibition and the only condition
Is hardly to mention or note.
They say she did vomit when she went with Mahommet
And he made her suck off his goat.
Like any good worker, she’ll arrive in a burqa
Or dressed as hospital nurse,
Or in something that’s flimsy to indulge all your whimsy,
And driving a dogteam or hearse.
I know it sounds corny but she’ll make you so horny.
She’ll love to make love with you.
You’ll work like magicians at changing positions
That give you the ultimate screw.
.. .
You’ll be at your ease with an amorous squeeze
When she starts with a peck on your cheek.
You don’t have to worry. There’s really no hurry
To reach the goal that you seek.
But in case of a hunch that she’s greedy for lunch,
You must give her something to eat,
And her oral fixation will get its sedation
When she chews on a morsel of meat.
Then fill up her glass and gaze at her arse
And you’ll dream of the pleasures to come.
Oh boy, what a sight! A joyous delight!
You’ll love the shape of her bum!
You’ll go down on your knees with the greatest of ease
To relish the joys of that!
This is your chance for a song and a dance,
For you know that she knows where it’s at.
She’ll take a few sips and pucker her lips
When it’s time to get on with the game
And your heart is afire with a frantic desire
And you know that she feels the same.
You’ll gently land your ravenous hand
On her gorgeous and heaving breast.
Oh, look at the ripples, the tips of her nipples,
And the sumptuous cleft of her chest!
How dearly you’ll lust for the curves of her bust,
As you loosen the straps of her bra.
You’ll want to begin by kissing the skin
Of the whore who allured from afar.
She’ll show that she cares for all that she shares
And will help you off with your shirt.
And while she is kneeling, and your manhood revealing,
You can fondle you under the skirt.
You can take off her panty, all sexy and scanty,
While your tongue her tits you caress.
And your trousers you shed as you move to the bed
And you drop the rest of her dress.
Now you will linger, as her thumb and forefinger,
Your cock she proceeds to massage.
She takes plenty of time, for it’s really a crime
To go fast when Shirlene’s in charge.
Then you can turn and see what you learn
As her mouth your body explores.
You can soon get around to her pubical mound.
And all that you longed for before.
And now she will swallow, for her mouth must be hollow,
Your cock, as it throbs with delight.
What a sensation, like hallucination!
It’s a rite that is right through the night!
She will suck on your shaft from the fore to the aft
And lick on the tip of your tool.
And then when you call, she will suck on a ball,
But keep it all gentle and cool.
She’ll be dying to go from above to below
And to take your bum on her face,
Fulfilling your dream of peaches and cream,
And the ways she can vary the pace.
She’ll be burning to roll her tongue in your hole
And to drink your sensational potion.
That is the swirl that you’ll do with this girl,
As she works in perpetual motion.
You can lick on her cunt from the back to the front,
And especially suck on her cherry.
She’ll be heaving in spasms, almighty orgasms,
As your tongue in her channel you bury.
You can love you this way for a year and a day
And drink of her honeydew juice.
And alternate sucking with sessions of fucking
Whenever you find an excuse.
You will dream that it’s Venus who’s sucking your penis,
Like a farmer’s milking machine.
She will suck in and out till your semen you spout:
When you come, you will know that you’ve been.
The fulfillment of dreams and ecstasy’s screams
Will be all that your body can bear.
And you know it for sure, there was never a whore
With Shirlene you want to compare.
After many long hours, with the sweetest of flowers,
Your lust shall surely be sated...
And you’ll always recall the sensational thrall
When with Shirlene the whore you were mated.
And now her ambition is to seek the fruition,
If no one tries to obstruct,
And to take off the pants of Ezra Levant’s
And to see that the fucker is fucked.
Post a Comment